The following is text of a news release from Euronav:
(ANTWERP, Belgium) — Euronav has three areas of concern when assessing scrubber installation on its fleet (to comply with the International Maritime Organization's 0.5 percent fuel sulfur cap in 2020) and continues to thoroughly investigate each of them.
1) Upfront capital investment of $5 million per VLCC with very low visibility on returns
Installing scrubbers requires an upfront capital investment today with virtually no visibility of a return on capital. Promoters of scrubbers have used MGO as a proxy for the price of compliant fuel. Some refiners including Sinochem have recently confirmed that they will sell clean compliant fuel at a price likely to be half the difference between dirty HFO and MGO. So the investment case now has half the returns being promoted and it is still 14 months before implementation and nothing suggests this price gap will not further narrow in that time.
2) Risk of pollution from scrubbers and operational concerns
Open-loop scrubbers (OLS) use seawater brought on board to remove sulfur from exhaust gases, but the wastewater produced contains a toxic cocktail of sulfuric acid constituents, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals which are pumped into the open ocean, essentially transferring pollution from air to sea.
(a) Pollution risks
Putting sulfur back into the sea reduces its natural buffering capacity.
Unknown cumulative impact of increasing sulfur content in world’s oceans.
Likely increase in ocean acidity over time.
OLS use increases CO2 emissions, cheaper fuel will incentivize owners to speed up the use of OLS.
(b) Operational risks
Additional capex and opex costs of operation.
Unproven application of this technology in a large volume tanker environment; known risk of corrosion.
Attention needed to mitigate safety/operational risks which are still quite uncertain.
(c) Lack of scrutiny over technology
Scrubber wastewater disposal has never been systematically investigated; no valid or long-term data available.
Cumulative impact on sensitive or congested sea lanes unknown.
(d) Future regulatory risks
Court of public opinion yet to be fully tested on OLS.
Risk of action by port or flag states.
Increasing application of rising CSR standards by investors and fuel producers.
Promoters of this technology argue that the open oceans dilute wastewater, rendering it harmless. But the solution to pollution is not dilution. Like plastic contamination over the years, we don’t know what the cumulative effect of this wastewater will be or how it will interact with existing seaborne pollutants, particularly in congested sea lanes like the English Channel, Malacca Straits or Baltic Sea.
3) Implementation and enforcement regime
Breaches of current emissions standards are on the rise in their existing Emission Control Areas (ECAs). So far flag states appear ill-equipped to ensure regulatory compliance. Installing a scrubber enables regulatory compliance with the continued use of non-compliant high sulfur fuel. But weak regulatory oversight means non-compliance in the open sea, whether through breakdown or malfeasance, cannot be effectively controlled.
Euronav wholeheartedly embraces the IMO 2020 regulations – we want to adopt the directive properly, universally and without delay. Refiners and oil producers have increasingly made clear that sufficient compliant fuel will be available. Scrubbers are therefore a loophole which makes enforcement of the sulfur ban extremely complex, difficult to enforce and likely to facilitate non-compliance.
Euronav continues to work closely with suppliers and producers on alternative mechanisms in which to capture volatility in the prices and differentials between HFO and LSFO and retains a very strong balance sheet providing optionality and flexibility to address the challenges of implementing IMO 2020.
Euronav is an independent tanker company engaged in the ocean transportation and storage of crude oil. The company is headquartered in Antwerp, Belgium, and has offices throughout Europe and Asia.